info@flemishrepublic.org
Friday March 19th, 2010
Welcome to The Flemish Republic

Why the Belgian federation should be dissolved and Flanders should become an independent state.
 TFR - FFI   Articles

Belgium Is Not a Model

05/01/2008 :: On 20 March, more than nine months after the Belgian general elections, which were held on June 10, 2007, Yves Leterme, the Flemish Christian-Democrat leader, finally managed to form a centre-left government coalition of Christian-Democrats, Liberals and Walloon Socialists.

Belgium is a country composed of 62% Dutch-speaking Flemings in Flanders, the northern part of the country, and 38% French-speaking Walloons in Wallonia, the southern part. The Flemings are largely conservative and free-market oriented; the Walloons are predominantly socialist because they are at the receiving end of the Belgian state’s welfare subsidies and want to keep it that way.

No programme

After more than six months without a government and three months with an “interim government” led by Guy Verhofstadt, the man who lost the June 10 elections but had been asked by King Albert II to return and help defuse the political crisis, Mr Leterme was able to form a coalition without a government programme.

The Belgian media do not expect the government to last long. The Flemish parties want a looser federation. The Walloon parties veto this. The Belgian Constitution requires that a majority is needed in each of the regions to change the Constitution.

Rotten institutions

The Economist
points out (March 27) that Belgium’s institutions are “rotten” because the necessity to find political compromises “proved fatal to democratic accountability. […] If the new government does not surrender more powers to the regions by July, Flemish separatists in the coalition could walk out, triggering a new crisis that edges Belgium a step closer to partition.

The Vlaams Belang favours the dissolution of Belgium and the establishment of two independent states: Flanders and Wallonia. The Economist, too, “see[s] Belgium’s new government not as a relief, but as an awful warning. A political union hatched together by a fractious elite, and answerable only to itself, is not a model for anybody to follow.” During the past nine months more and more Flemings have come to share our (and The Economist’s) view that Belgium should be dissolved. Sadly, Mr Leterme apparently chose to become the last Prime Minister of Belgium rather than the first President of an independent Flanders.



  • Article in issue nº 22


  • Previous page
  • FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS ABOUT FLEMISH INDEPENDENCE

    Why Flemish independence is the only solution?
    Politicians of the establishment Flemish parties, who are often too pragmatic, campaign for constitutional revisions and adjustments within the Belgian federal ... | more

    Brussels as the bilingual capital of a free Flanders?
    Historically, Brussels was a Dutch-speaking city. Research shows that less than 5% of all preserved public documents written before 1500 were written in French.... | more

    But what about ‘national solidarity’ with Wallonia?
    It is untrue to say that the Flemish people do not contribute to so-called ‘national solidarity’. Annually, between 5 tot 12 billion Euros flow from Flanders to... | more

  • More questions
  •  © 2008-2010 Vlaams Belang - All rights reserved - Terms of Use